PMC announced that a new study by the American Judicature Society confirms Pennsylvanians’ concerns about the problematic role of money in judicial elections. More than two-thirds of the civil cases decided by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 2008 and 2009 included a litigant, lawyer or law firm who previously had made a campaign contribution to at least one of the elected justices.
Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts today announced that a new study by the American Judicature Society confirms Pennsylvanians’ concerns about the problematic role of money in judicial elections.


